Although fullerenes--spherical molecules made entirely of carbon--were first found in the laboratory, they have since been found in nature, formed in fissures of the rare mineral shungite. Since laboratory synthesis of fullerenes requires distinctive conditions of temperature and pressure, this discovery should give geologists a test case for evaluating hypotheses about the state of the Earth's crust at the time these naturally occurring fullerenes were formed.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the argument?
Confirming that the shungite genuinely contained fullerenes took careful experimentation.
Some fullerenes have also been found on the remains of a small meteorite that collided with a spacecraft.
The mineral shungite itself contains large amounts of carbon, from which the fullerenes apparently formed.
The naturally occurring fullerenes are arranged in a previously unknown crystalline structure.
Shungite itself is formed only under distinctive conditions.
前提:特定环境=》f 产生;结论:由f=》当时环境。我原本以为应该找其他环境也可以推出f的例子,所以选了b,但是其实b没有表明这个环境和实验室里不同。d选项指出了自然环境的f和实验室环境的f本质是不同的,那么我们就不能由自然环境的f反推导自然环境了。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论