Although fullerenes--spherical molecules made entirely of carbon--were first found in the laboratory, they have since been found in nature, formed in fissures of the rare mineral shungite. Since laboratory synthesis of fullerenes requires distinctive conditions of temperature and pressure, this discovery should give geologists a test case for evaluating hypotheses about the state of the Earth's crust at the time these naturally occurring fullerenes were formed.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the argument?
Confirming that the shungite genuinely contained fullerenes took careful experimentation.
Some fullerenes have also been found on the remains of a small meteorite that collided with a spacecraft.
The mineral shungite itself contains large amounts of carbon, from which the fullerenes apparently formed.
The naturally occurring fullerenes are arranged in a previously unknown crystalline structure.
Shungite itself is formed only under distinctive conditions.
CR还是必须把四个选线看完再选啊。
B太有迷惑性了。原文已经说了 F have since been found in nature….(出自原文的evidence句),意为这这句话乃100%正确。D对,因为D说了found in nature的跟实验室不同,直接攻击了原文最关键的assumption:“两种物质一致”,所以可用用来研究自然环境。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论