Although fullerenes--spherical molecules made entirely of carbon--were first found in the laboratory, they have since been found in nature, formed in fissures of the rare mineral shungite. Since laboratory synthesis of fullerenes requires distinctive conditions of temperature and pressure, this discovery should give geologists a test case for evaluating hypotheses about the state of the Earth's crust at the time these naturally occurring fullerenes were formed.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the argument?
Confirming that the shungite genuinely contained fullerenes took careful experimentation.
Some fullerenes have also been found on the remains of a small meteorite that collided with a spacecraft.
The mineral shungite itself contains large amounts of carbon, from which the fullerenes apparently formed.
The naturally occurring fullerenes are arranged in a previously unknown crystalline structure.
Shungite itself is formed only under distinctive conditions.
· 原文最关键的assumption:“两种物质一致”,所以lab的F可用用来研究自然环境
· 类比的对象:实验室合成的F和自然形成的富勒烯
· 推翻类比:类比对象的不同点——D选项:天然存在的F以先前未知的晶体结构排列,因此与lab合成的不同
但B选项没有表明陨石撞击M的环境和实验室里不同,不能否定关键assumption
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论