Although fullerenes--spherical molecules made entirely of carbon--were first found in the laboratory, they have since been found in nature, formed in fissures of the rare mineral shungite. Since laboratory synthesis of fullerenes requires distinctive conditions of temperature and pressure, this discovery should give geologists a test case for evaluating hypotheses about the state of the Earth's crust at the time these naturally occurring fullerenes were formed.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the argument?
Confirming that the shungite genuinely contained fullerenes took careful experimentation.
Some fullerenes have also been found on the remains of a small meteorite that collided with a spacecraft.
The mineral shungite itself contains large amounts of carbon, from which the fullerenes apparently formed.
The naturally occurring fullerenes are arranged in a previously unknown crystalline structure.
Shungite itself is formed only under distinctive conditions.
实验室和自然界都有物质F——实验室里的F在一定的温度和压力下形成——可以据此探测自然的F形成时地壳的状态。可以看出来这其实是把实验室F的性质迁移到了自然F身上,两个东西在类比。要削弱的话,就要考虑自然界F和实验室F是不是一样的。D就是说,自然F是以一种以前不知道的结构呈现的,这和实验室F是不一样的。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论