Although fullerenes--spherical molecules made entirely of carbon--were first found in the laboratory, they have since been found in nature, formed in fissures of the rare mineral shungite. Since laboratory synthesis of fullerenes requires distinctive conditions of temperature and pressure, this discovery should give geologists a test case for evaluating hypotheses about the state of the Earth's crust at the time these naturally occurring fullerenes were formed.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the argument?
Confirming that the shungite genuinely contained fullerenes took careful experimentation.
Some fullerenes have also been found on the remains of a small meteorite that collided with a spacecraft.
The mineral shungite itself contains large amounts of carbon, from which the fullerenes apparently formed.
The naturally occurring fullerenes are arranged in a previously unknown crystalline structure.
Shungite itself is formed only under distinctive conditions.
类比,F有天然、有人工的;人工需要复杂条件1,因此需要观测F在地球上天然形成时的条件2
削弱,证明二者不同
A、F被仔细测试,与二者不同无关
B、一些F没在地球上发现,与二者不同无关
C、mineral shungite中有碳,与二者不同无关
D、天然的F有个未知的结构,即人工搞不定的,CORRECT
E、Shungite特性,与二者不同无关
真的相似吗?(CQ1)有没有反例C呢?(CQ2)
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论