Jennifer: Video rental outlets in Centerville together handled 10,000 fewer video rentals in 1994 than in 1993. The decline in rentals was probably due almost entirely to the February 1994 opening of Videorama, the first and only video rental outlet in the area that, in addition to renting videos, also sold them cheaply.
Brad: There must be another explanation: as you yourself said, the decline was on the order of 10,000 rentals. Yet Videorama sold only 4,000 videos in 1994.
Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the force of the objection that Brad presents to Jennifer's explanation?
In 1994 Videorama rented out more videos than it sold.
In 1994 two new outlets that rent but that do not sell videos opened in Centerville.
Most of the video rental outlets in Centerville rent videos at a discount on certain nights of the week.
People often buy videos of movies that they have previously seen in a theater.
People who own videos frequently loan them to their friends.
请问为什么A不对呢?他说V卖出4000,然后租的比卖的多,那不就说明V 的租赁抢了C的租赁吗?
C这个地方的整个video出租量都下降了, Video rental outlets in 【Centerville together】handled 10,000 fewer video rentals in 1994 than in 1993. 【The decline in rentals 】was probably due almost entirely to ,V的出租量本来就包含在整个出租量里边。
新开的Videorama是在C这个地区的,所以减少的10000里也包括Videorama的rentals
Thx!
mark
Thx
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论