Urban air contains more sulfur dioxide than does rural air, and plants in cities typically grow more slowly than do plants in rural areas. In an experiment to see how much of the difference in growth is due to sulfur dioxide, classes in an urban and a rural school grew plants in greenhouses at their schools and filtered the greenhouse air to eliminate sulfur dioxide. Plants in the urban greenhouse grew more slowly than those in the rural greenhouse.
Which of the following, if true, would it be most important to take into account in evaluating the result?
The urban school was located in a part of the city in which levels of sulfur dioxide in the air were usually far lower than is typical for urban areas.
At both schools, the plants in the greenhouses grew much more quickly than did plants planted outdoors in plots near the greenhouses.
The urban class conducting the experiment was larger than the rural class conducting the experiment.
Heavy vehicular traffic such as is found in cities constantly deposits grime on greenhouse windows, reducing the amount of light that reaches the plants inside.
Because of the higher levels of sulfur dioxide in the air at the urban school, the air filters for the urban school's greenhouse were changed more frequently than were those at the rural school.
理论上 如果是SO2影响植物生长,那么去除SO2变量的影响后,城市的和乡村的植物应该长的一样好。然而现实并不是,二者生长还是有差异。解释
A 位置差异,但是实验已经比S的影响去掉了
B 在温室里生长的都比室外生长的快 。我们想知道的城市和乡村的比较,不是一个地方室内室外的比较
C 实验规模,无关
D 光照没了,光合作用差,植物长的慢,解释
E 更换过滤器的频率 无关
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论