Urban air contains more sulfur dioxide than does rural air, and plants in cities typically grow more slowly than do plants in rural areas. In an experiment to see how much of the difference in growth is due to sulfur dioxide, classes in an urban and a rural school grew plants in greenhouses at their schools and filtered the greenhouse air to eliminate sulfur dioxide. Plants in the urban greenhouse grew more slowly than those in the rural greenhouse.
Which of the following, if true, would it be most important to take into account in evaluating the result?
The urban school was located in a part of the city in which levels of sulfur dioxide in the air were usually far lower than is typical for urban areas.
At both schools, the plants in the greenhouses grew much more quickly than did plants planted outdoors in plots near the greenhouses.
The urban class conducting the experiment was larger than the rural class conducting the experiment.
Heavy vehicular traffic such as is found in cities constantly deposits grime on greenhouse windows, reducing the amount of light that reaches the plants inside.
Because of the higher levels of sulfur dioxide in the air at the urban school, the air filters for the urban school's greenhouse were changed more frequently than were those at the rural school.
我觉得e选项很合适呢,题目中就是提到了sulfur,e选项也是紧贴sulfur的清除这个维度。城市中sulfur更多,不是应该要把更频繁的更换滤网考虑进去吗?这样才能保证实验结果的公平性呀。只不过按照e的说法,和题干中的结果(城市中还是生长的更慢)匹对不起来,所以e选项到底错在哪里呢??请各位锦鲤来指教一下
更频繁的更换滤网并没有直接说明会对实验结果造成什么不同影响呀, 如果非要说有, 那就属于自己脑补了
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论