Urban air contains more sulfur dioxide than does rural air, and plants in cities typically grow more slowly than do plants in rural areas. In an experiment to see how much of the difference in growth is due to sulfur dioxide, classes in an urban and a rural school grew plants in greenhouses at their schools and filtered the greenhouse air to eliminate sulfur dioxide. Plants in the urban greenhouse grew more slowly than those in the rural greenhouse.
Which of the following, if true, would it be most important to take into account in evaluating the result?
The urban school was located in a part of the city in which levels of sulfur dioxide in the air were usually far lower than is typical for urban areas.
At both schools, the plants in the greenhouses grew much more quickly than did plants planted outdoors in plots near the greenhouses.
The urban class conducting the experiment was larger than the rural class conducting the experiment.
Heavy vehicular traffic such as is found in cities constantly deposits grime on greenhouse windows, reducing the amount of light that reaches the plants inside.
Because of the higher levels of sulfur dioxide in the air at the urban school, the air filters for the urban school's greenhouse were changed more frequently than were those at the rural school.
类比,
城市比乡村SO2多,植物长得慢
为了探寻植物生长速度与SO2含量的关系,在城市及乡村种植物,控制变量SO2,结果发现城市植物还是比农村长得慢
题目要求:引入重要变量
A、被测试的城市学校SO2低于城市的其他区域,与城市/农村对比无关
B、城市农村学校里植物长得比外面快,与城市/农村对比无关
C、被测城市学校面积比农村大,与植物生长速度无关
D、城市交通繁忙挡光,他因削弱,证明没有很好地控制所有变量,CORRECT
E、城市的滤网换得比农村频繁,很tricky,但就算这样,也不能说明控制SO2变量的水准是否有区别(没说换得快效果就好)
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论