In the late 1980s, the population of sea otters in the North Pacific began to decline. There are two plausible explanations for the decline: predation, possibly by killer whales, or disease. Of these two, disease is the more likely, since a concurrent sharp decline in populations of seals and sea lions is believed to have been caused by disease, and diseases that infect these creatures are likely to be able to infect sea otters also.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the reasoning?
Killer whales in the North Pacific usually prey on seals and sea lions but will, when this food source is scarce, seek out other prey.
There is no indication that the sea otter population at any North Pacific location declined in the 1980s because of substantial numbers of sea otters migrating to other locations.
Along the Pacific coast of North America in the 1980s, sea otters were absent from many locations where they had been relatively common in former times.
Following the decline in the population of the sea otters, there was an increase in the population of sea urchins, which are sea otters' main food source.
The North Pacific populations of seals and sea lions cover a wider geographic area than does the population of sea otters.
场景:sea otter 的减少有2个可能原因:被吃或患病。因为seals和sea lions被相信因为是患病而数量急剧减少,所以sea otter减少的原因更有可能是sea otter也受到了这些疾病的感染。所以不太可能是被吃掉。
选项A:Killer whales是靠seals 和 sea lions为食的,如果它们数量少了,Killer whales就会找其他猎物,这样sea otter更可能是被吃掉而不是患病的。 ---by Sping
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论