Tiger beetles are such fast runners that they can capture virtually any nonflying insect. However, when running toward an insect, the beetles intermittently stop, and then, a moment later, resume their attack. Perhaps they cannot maintain their pace and must pause for a moment's rest; but an alternative hypothesis is that while running tiger beetles are unable to process the resulting rapidly changing visual information, and so quickly go blind and stop.
Which of the following, if discovered in experiments using artificially moved prey insects, would support one of the two hypotheses and undermine the other?
When a prey insect is moved directly toward a beetle that has been chasing it, the beetle immediately turns and runs away without its usual intermittent stopping.
In pursuing a moving insect, the beetles usually respond immediately to changes in the insect's direction, and pause equally frequently whether the chase is up or down an incline.
The beetles maintain a fixed time interval between pauses, although when an insect that had been stationary begins to flee, the beetle increases its speed after its next pause.
If, when a beetle pauses, it has not gained on the insect it is pursuing, the beetle generally ends its pursuit.
When an obstacle is suddenly introduced just in front of running beetles, the beetles sometimes stop immediately, but they never respond by running around the barrier.
感觉c是说尽管甲虫会加速,但是他们的两次停顿之间的时间是一个固定值。加速的话,导致更容易看不清,那么应该更频繁的停顿才对,不会是固定值,故削弱由于视觉疲劳导致的假设;同样的,可加速说明可快可慢,那么就是不能保持pace,由于两次停顿之间时间一致,也就是捕猎时间一致,所以甲虫好损能量是可以保持一个定值的,到了这个临界点就所以必须休息一下。。。那么加强
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论