Tiger beetles are such fast runners that they can capture virtually any nonflying insect. However, when running toward an insect, the beetles intermittently stop, and then, a moment later, resume their attack. Perhaps they cannot maintain their pace and must pause for a moment's rest; but an alternative hypothesis is that while running tiger beetles are unable to process the resulting rapidly changing visual information, and so quickly go blind and stop.
Which of the following, if discovered in experiments using artificially moved prey insects, would support one of the two hypotheses and undermine the other?
When a prey insect is moved directly toward a beetle that has been chasing it, the beetle immediately turns and runs away without its usual intermittent stopping.
In pursuing a moving insect, the beetles usually respond immediately to changes in the insect's direction, and pause equally frequently whether the chase is up or down an incline.
The beetles maintain a fixed time interval between pauses, although when an insect that had been stationary begins to flee, the beetle increases its speed after its next pause.
If, when a beetle pauses, it has not gained on the insect it is pursuing, the beetle generally ends its pursuit.
When an obstacle is suddenly introduced just in front of running beetles, the beetles sometimes stop immediately, but they never respond by running around the barrier.
A选项说它不停,直接否认了这两个
B选项前面否定hypothesis2,因为他跑的时候能看清,后半段pause equally frequently whether the chase is up or down an incline.也否定了hypothesis1
C选项即使加速,他也固定时间停下,说明和体力无关,否定H1,同时肯定H2,他不会立刻加速,只会停下来之后在下一轮开始加速,这说明高速追逐的时候他是看不清的
D选项,停下不追了,无关
E选项,说明视力没问题,否定了H2,但并没有肯定H1,问题问的是否定一个与此同时肯定另一个,故错误
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论