Tiger beetles are such fast runners that they can capture virtually any nonflying insect. However, when running toward an insect, the beetles intermittently stop, and then, a moment later, resume their attack. Perhaps they cannot maintain their pace and must pause for a moment's rest; but an alternative hypothesis is that while running tiger beetles are unable to process the resulting rapidly changing visual information, and so quickly go blind and stop.
Which of the following, if discovered in experiments using artificially moved prey insects, would support one of the two hypotheses and undermine the other?
When a prey insect is moved directly toward a beetle that has been chasing it, the beetle immediately turns and runs away without its usual intermittent stopping.
In pursuing a moving insect, the beetles usually respond immediately to changes in the insect's direction, and pause equally frequently whether the chase is up or down an incline.
The beetles maintain a fixed time interval between pauses, although when an insect that had been stationary begins to flee, the beetle increases its speed after its next pause.
If, when a beetle pauses, it has not gained on the insect it is pursuing, the beetle generally ends its pursuit.
When an obstacle is suddenly introduced just in front of running beetles, the beetles sometimes stop immediately, but they never respond by running around the barrier.
这是在support体力不支的选项而undermine看不见的那个选项。因为:1已经看到猎物飞走了还要每隔一段时间休息一下不是很蠢 么,只可能是飞不动了,2如果已经看不见了后来又要加速追赶不是更加看不见了么。。。理解2:这是在support视力不好的解释而undermine体力不支的解释,因为后面说道加速,但是前面有说每隔一段固定时间休息一下,如果是加速飞行的话体力不支的更厉害,应该缩短休息时间,而现在这样的做法(每隔一段固定时间休息一下,只是因为每隔一段时间就要定位一下,看一下周围的情况,同时,在上次停顿后看清后可以飞的更快。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论