Twelve years ago and again five years ago, there were extended periods when the Darfir Republic's currency, the pundra, was weak: its value was unusually low relative to the world's most stable currencies. Both times a weak pundra made Darfir's manufactured products a bargain on world markets, and Darfir's exports were up substantially. Now some politicians are saying that, in order to cause another similarly sized increase in exports, the government should allow the pundra to become weak again.
Which of the following, if true, provides the government with the strongest grounds to doubt that the politicians' recommendation, if followed, will achieve its aim?
Several of the politicians now recommending that the pundra be allowed to become weak made that same recommendation before each of the last two periods of currency weakness.
After several decades of operating well below peak capacity, Darfir's manufacturing sector is now operating at near-peak levels.
The economy of a country experiencing a rise in exports will become healthier only if the country's currency is strong or the rise in exports is significant.
Those countries whose manufactured products compete with Darfir's on the world market all currently have stable currencies.
A sharp improvement in the efficiency of Darfir's manufacturing plants would make Darfir's products a bargain on world markets even without any weakening of the pundra relative to other currencies.
B.因为原来完全在最大生产力之下,刺激有效,增长出口,但是现在生产力已趋近顶点,刺激无用。削弱
E.生产力的巨大改变可以使得产品在国际市场上成为便宜货从而不需要降低。错误,自己最常出的错误,此题前提之前的降低带来出口的增加,现在因需要出口增加提议需要再来一次减少。问题是这个提案是否可行。另一个可选方案并无法判断此方法是否可行。即使另一个方案更好,也无法排除问题中方法很好的可能。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论