The population of Megacity, a sprawling metropolis in Remsland, has grown at a fairly steady rate for over a century. A hundred years ago, poor sanitation in the city caused high mortality rates among the city's inhabitants, and what fueled the population increase was immigration from rural villages. This immigration has continued and even increased. Moreover, in recent decades, city sanitation has improved enormously. Yet the city's population growth has not significantly accelerated.
Which of the following, if true, most helps to explain why the city's population growth rate has not changed?
Mortality rates that were associated with poor sanitation in Megacity a hundred years ago were orders of magnitude higher than are mortality rates associated with vehicular traffic, which is currently a major cause of death in the city.
For several decades, Megacity, as distinct from the countryside, has had a steadily declining birth rate.
Cities smaller than Megacity have also experienced sustained population growth.
The great majority of immigrants to Remsland settle in Megacity, at least initially.
Megacity has long offered better employment prospects than most rural areas.
A并不是他因,车祸是major cause并不能说明mortality增加或者维持不变,更何况卫生差导致的死亡率还高于车祸死亡率。所以不能想当然觉得卫生条件改善了但有车祸啊,死亡率肯定很高或更高。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论