To reduce the danger to life and property posed by major earthquakes, scientists have been investigating several techniques for giving advance warning of dangerous earthquakes. Since catfish swim erratically before earthquakes, some investigators have proposed monitoring catfish to predict dangerous earthquakes.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the usefulness of the proposal?
In Japan, which is subject to frequent earthquakes, the behavior of catfish has long been associated with earthquakes.
Mechanical methods for detecting earthquakes have not proved effective.
Tremors lead to the release of hydrogen sulfide gas into water, thereby causing various fish and shellfish to behave erratically.
Careful construction can reduce the dangers posed by earthquakes.
Even very slight, fleeting tremors cause catfish to swim erratically.
想问下c为啥不对
我觉得,这题问的是undermines the usefulness of the proposal,C选项没有削弱这个proposal的usefulness,因为不管tremor是使得鱼类behave erratically的间接还是直接原因,都不影响这个proposal能否使用。
其他鱼类对于气体的反应和题目里这个鱼类做出类似反应的行为没有关系。另外冒昧问一句……您是贾庆林吗……
嗯嗯,明白了
好,我知道了,我是贾庆玲
C 是在解释为什么鱼会异常,是解释这个proposal的理论依据。D 是举个反例,如果微笑的震颤也令鱼异常,那么这种方法就不可用了。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论