Generally scientists enter their field with the goal of doing important new research and accept as their colleagues those with similar motivation. Therefore, when any scientist wins renown as an expounder of science to general audiences, most other scientists conclude that this popularizer should no longer be regarded as a true colleague.
The explanation offered above for the low esteem in which scientific popularizers are held by research scientists assumes that
serious scientific research is not a solitary activity, but relies on active cooperation among a group of colleagues
research scientists tend not to regard as colleagues those scientists whose renown they envy
a scientist can become a famous popularizer without having completed any important research
research scientists believe that those who are well known as popularizers of science are not motivated to do important new research
no important new research can be accessible to or accurately assessed by those who are not themselves scientists
因果
科学家是受伟大研究而驱动的,并且只视以此为驱动力的工作者为同仁。
如果一位科学家被誉为普及者,那么他也就不再是科学家的同仁了。
Assu,增强因果联系
A、科学研究需要合作,无关
B、科学家不会将自己的敌人视为同仁,无关
C、一位没做过完整研究的科学家也可以成为popularizer,做没做过完整研究与受什么驱动无关
D、被认为是popularizer的科学家不再motivated to do important new research,不再这样,也就不再被视为同仁了,CORRECT
E、不是科学家的人不能接触或准确评价important new research,无关(与同仁无关)
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论