A certain mayor has proposed a fee of five dollars per day on private vehicles entering the city, claiming that the fee will alleviate the city's traffic congestion. The mayor reasons that, since the fee will exceed the cost of round-trip bus fare from many nearby points, many people will switch from using their cars to using the bus.
Which of the following statements, if true, provides the best evidence that the mayor's reasoning is flawed?
Projected increases in the price of gasoline will increase the cost of taking a private vehicle into the city.
The cost of parking fees already makes it considerably more expensive for most people to take a private vehicle into the city than to take a bus.
Most of the people currently riding the bus do not own private vehicles.
Many commuters opposing the mayor's plan have indicated that they would rather endure traffic congestion than pay a five-dollar-per day fee.
During the average workday, private vehicles owned and operated by people living within the city account for twenty percent of the city's traffic congestion.
(老师的意思好像是相关因果)
个人看法:
P:fee比bus的高一点( many nearby points )
C:转而去乘坐bus
说一下d为什么错
D选项认为方案没有实施的情况下,削成了方案的可行问题。但是题目中的意思是在实施的情况下,因此要找直接削弱结论的(达不到果的)
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论