As part of major renovations to Flowertown's Main Street train station, consultants to the train company proposed moving the station's entrance from its current valuable Main Street location to a low-rent adjoining side street and then leasing the high-rent entrance space to retail businesses. In that way, the train company could easily pay for those and all other proposed renovations without negative impact on its tight budget.
Which of the following, if true, would most strongly support the consultants' proposal?
More train commuters are employed in businesses located on Main Street than in businesses located on the adjoining side street.
A reliable survey of Flowertown's commuters showed that virtually none of them would use the train any less frequently if the station's entrance were moved.
The high-rent block of Flowertown's Main Street includes several buildings whose owners currently seek to replace long-standing tenants lost in recent months.
If the station's entrance were moved, the train company would need to begin costly renovations to its Main Street entrance space.
Ridership on Flowertown trains declined only slightly from 1970 to 1985 while other train companies lost large numbers of commuters.
手段,入口从高租金(主街)往低租金(边上)移动,对 tight budget没坏影响
增强,手段用了比没用好、副作用弱
A、主街人流量大,通勤者多,削弱
B、入口移动对通勤没影响,CORRECT
C、包租婆寻找长期租客,与入口移动无关
D、移动入口花的更多,budget雪上加霜,削弱
E、1970-1985的事儿,不知所云
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论