As part of major renovations to Flowertown's Main Street train station, consultants to the train company proposed moving the station's entrance from its current valuable Main Street location to a low-rent adjoining side street and then leasing the high-rent entrance space to retail businesses. In that way, the train company could easily pay for those and all other proposed renovations without negative impact on its tight budget.
Which of the following, if true, would most strongly support the consultants' proposal?
More train commuters are employed in businesses located on Main Street than in businesses located on the adjoining side street.
A reliable survey of Flowertown's commuters showed that virtually none of them would use the train any less frequently if the station's entrance were moved.
The high-rent block of Flowertown's Main Street includes several buildings whose owners currently seek to replace long-standing tenants lost in recent months.
If the station's entrance were moved, the train company would need to begin costly renovations to its Main Street entrance space.
Ridership on Flowertown trains declined only slightly from 1970 to 1985 while other train companies lost large numbers of commuters.
两个改变:转移车站入口、将原高租金入口出租。相比原先一味的资金输出,后者将可能为公司输入资金;而转移车站入口带来三种可能——使用火车人流减少、不变、增多,第一种可能性存在负面影响,后两者与B选项不谋而合。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论