In many corporations, employees are being replaced by automated equipment in order to save money. However, many workers who lose their jobs to automation will need government assistance to survive, and the same corporations that are laying people off will eventually pay for that assistance through increased taxes and unemployment insurance payments.
Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the author's argument?
Many workers who have already lost their jobs to automation have been unable to find new jobs.
Many corporations that have failed to automate have seen their profits decline.
Taxes and unemployment insurance are paid also by corporations that are not automating.
Most of the new jobs created by automation pay less than the jobs eliminated by automation did.
The initial investment in machinery for automation is often greater than the short-term savings in labor costs.
有点confuse为什么要选a呢
题干是说,很多公司为了节约成本,用自动化机器取代工人。但,失业的工人需要政府养活,裁员的公司为此最终也要支付更高的税和失业保险(结论)。问加强
首先,需要弄明白企业支付更高的税和保险的根本原因是什么——失业率增加了,这又是由之前解约的员工找不到新工作导致的。如果解约后能找到新工作,就不需要政府救援了,政府也不需要收裁员公司交纳的钱了。所以A是加强。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论