In many corporations, employees are being replaced by automated equipment in order to save money. However, many workers who lose their jobs to automation will need government assistance to survive, and the same corporations that are laying people off will eventually pay for that assistance through increased taxes and unemployment insurance payments.
Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the author's argument?
Many workers who have already lost their jobs to automation have been unable to find new jobs.
Many corporations that have failed to automate have seen their profits decline.
Taxes and unemployment insurance are paid also by corporations that are not automating.
Most of the new jobs created by automation pay less than the jobs eliminated by automation did.
The initial investment in machinery for automation is often greater than the short-term savings in labor costs.
许多公司为了省钱会把员工裁掉换成机器。然而很多因此失业的员工会需要政府救助,裁员的公司最终会通过增加的税金和失业保险付出代价。
conclusion: 采取自动化而裁员的公司最终会为自己的行为买单
choice a, 许多因为自动化失业的员工很难找到工作。correct
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论