扫描二维码，直接登录
题库 / Prep2007E1-CR-71
In many corporations, employees are being replaced by automated equipment in order to save money. However, many workers who lose their jobs to automation will need government assistance to survive, and the same corporations that are laying people off will eventually pay for that assistance through increased taxes and unemployment insurance payments.
Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the author's argument?
Many workers who have already lost their jobs to automation have been unable to find new jobs.
Many corporations that have failed to automate have seen their profits decline.
Taxes and unemployment insurance are paid also by corporations that are not automating.
Most of the new jobs created by automation pay less than the jobs eliminated by automation did.
The initial investment in machinery for automation is often greater than the short-term savings in labor costs.
Argument的结论是那些因为要省钱自动化而裁员的公司最终得不偿失，讲的是裁员后要付出的一系列代价
E说的是初始投资很大，无关
且题目讲到失业的员工可以拿到资助，所以要加强的话，得有个前提是这些人一直都处于失业状态，才能获得救助，不然都马上找到工作了自然公司和政府也不会掏这些钱了
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论