Historians have identified two dominant currents in the Russian women's movement of the late tsarist period. "Bourgeois" feminism, so called by its more radical opponents, emphasized "individualist" feminist goals such as access to education, career opportunities, and legal equality. "Socialist" feminists, by contrast, emphasized class, rather than gender, as the principal source of women's inequality and oppression, and socialist revolution, not legal reform, as the only road to emancipation and equality.
However, despite antagonism between bourgeois feminists and socialist feminists, the two movements shared certain underlying beliefs. Both regarded paid labor as the principal means by which women might attain emancipation: participation in the workplace and economic self-sufficiency, they believed, would make women socially useful and therefore deserving of equality with men. Both groups also recognized the enormous difficulties women faced when they combined paid labor with motherhood. In fact, at the First All-Russian Women's Congress in 1908, most participants advocated maternity insurance and paid maternity leave, although the intense hostility between some socialists and bourgeois feminists at the Congress made it difficult for them to recognize these areas of agreement. Finally, socialist feminists and most bourgeois feminists concurred in subordinating women's emancipation to what they considered the more important goal of liberating the entire Russian population from political oppression, economic backwardness, and social injustice.
The passage is primarily concerned with
identifying points of agreement between two groups
advocating one approach to social reform over another
contrasting two approaches to solving a political problem
arguing that the views espoused by one political group were more radical than those espoused by another group
criticizing historians for overlooking similarities between the views espoused by two superficially dissimilar groups
题目分析:
题目释义:
主旨题目
考点:
主旨(Main idea)
旨在考察我们对文章整体的把握程度,对文章的结构的分析能力和把控能力,以及对作者逻辑的判断。
作者从逻辑上是希望说明这两种女权主义者是有相同点的。
选项分析:
A选项:Correct。确认两组女权主义者都同意的地方。这个完全符合刚刚分析出的意思。
B选项:宣传对于社会改革的两种方式中的一种。作者并不是想宣传或倡导哪种女权主义者的理论,而是突出说明两种女权主义者所都同意的地方。
C选项:比较两种解决政治问题的方式。作者没有比较两者之意,只是想说明两者的相同点。(如果目的是比较的话,至少也该有不同点)。
D选项:说明一个政治组织所信奉的观点比另一个组织的更加激进。同C,更没有说过哪个更加激进些。
E选项:批评历史学者关于忽略两个表面上不同的组织所信奉的观点的相同点。这个选项相对比较贴边,但是作者从没批判过什么的历史学家,也没说过两个组织只是表面上不同。
However, despite antagonism between bourgeois feminists and socialist feminists, the two movements shared certain underlying beliefs.
however,despite这种衔接词,表示反向的核心态度
c还错在solving a political problem,女权运动的两派,原文没提到过要解决的问题
只说历史学家分了两类,没有批评历史学家哦,也没有说这两类只是表面上不同(实际上第一段能看出这两类是本质上有不同的吧)
topic sentence:However, despite antagonism between bourgeois feminists and socialist feminists, the two movements shared certain underlying beliefs.
A:虽然说了不同,但是整篇文章用更多的篇幅在强调shared certain beliefs
points of agreement=》一致的观点(做题的时候不知道脑子抽什么风半天理解不了agreement在这里是啥意思)
虽然这道题理解了.....但是有一篇讲civil war的文章里面也有个主旨判断题....看了老师的讲解也还不是很明白.......求老师和同学能不能讲一下这种类似的主旨题该怎么做........
补充一下,注意however,despite,还有although。。尤其是however。。。however前面说的是不同点,后面说的是相同点,很多材料都有说however后面的东西才是重点
可是第一段不就是对比了两组人的观点吗?