Women are expected to be the majority of students entering law school this fall, a trend ultimately placing more women in leadership positions in politics and business.
Women are expected to be the majority of students entering law school this fall, a trend ultimately placing
The majority of students entering law school this fall are expected to be women, a trend that will ultimately place
The majority of students entering law school this fall are expected to be women, which will ultimately place
It is expected that the majority of students entering law school this fall will be women, a trend ultimately placing
It is expected for women to be the majority of students entering law school this fall, which will ultimately place
感谢由 我要**** 对此题目的解答所做出的贡献。
(A) 同位语a trend的分词后置定语placing,不能表现出即将发生的趋势,而是表达了一直发生的含义。
(B) correct,用that定语从句修饰同位语trend,清楚地表明了要发生的动作。
(C) which不能指代前面整个句子。
(D) 同位语a trend的分词后置定语placing,不能表现出即将发生的趋势,而是表达了一直发生的含义;it is expected that…的表达不简洁。
(E) which不能指代前面整个句子;it is expected for sb to…的表达不简洁。
a is wrong because of the participle 'placing', which wrongly indicates that this trend is already placing more women in leadership positions.
c is wrong because the relative pronoun 'which' is placed in a position where it must refer to 'women'. this is wrong for 2 different reasons: (a) 'which' can't refer to people, and (b) according to the sentence, women don't place themselves in leadership positions; the trend does.
ultimately蕴含有发生在未来的含义,所以应当搭配将来时,所以是will ultimately place【来自曼哈顿语法Chapter10】
ultimately通常要搭配will来表示未来
注意点:ing的现在进行含义;将来时态;时间副词位置防止歧义
我咋没看到曼哈顿SC写了ultimately哇?
a trend ultimately placing,placing是现在分词作定语修饰trend,跟随主句时态,是一般现在时。如果有are,placing才是谓语动词表示进行时
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
(A) 同位语a trend的分词后置定语placing,不能表现出即将发生的趋势,而是表达了一直发生的含义。
(B) correct,用that定语从句修饰同位语trend,清楚地表明了要发生的动作。
(C) which不能指代前面整个句子。
(D) 同位语a trend的分词后置定语placing,不能表现出即将发生的趋势,而是表达了一直发生的含义;it is expected that…的表达不简洁。
(E) which不能指代前面整个句子;it is expected for sb to…的表达不简洁。
应该是即将发生的趋势,故后面应该是will do,所以B正确A错误
C D都用which指代一个“事情”,用法错误。
D: 表示“看法”的词think/know/expect的主动语态可以加that引导的宾语从句,但是被动语态都不能加that从句。it is expected that ...是错误的用法,it is expected to do 才正确。
A“女生预计是学生的多数”和B“学生的多数预计是女生”,B更合理;另外V-ing做定语修饰名词的时候,时态跟主句时态一致,在题里边说的就是”当下“。当要表达不一样的时态的时候,要换成定语从句。trend在”当下“还没有发生,所以B合理。
(A) 同位语a trend的分词后置定语placing,不能表现出即将发生的趋势,而是表达了一直发生的含义。
(B) correct,用that定语从句修饰同位语trend,清楚地表明了要发生的动作。
(C) which不能指代前面整个句子。
(D) 同位语a trend的分词后置定语placing,不能表现出即将发生的趋势,而是表达了一直发生的含义;it is expected that…的表达不简洁。
(E) which不能指代前面整个句子;it is expected for sb to…的表达不简洁。
现在分词做伴随状语,不能表达将来时
A. a trend后面的placing修饰trend,代表trend的状态,而没有起到解释说明的作用
C.gmat里which不能代整句话!(就是记不住)
B vs.D:用定语从句修饰同位语优于用伴随状语修饰,后者有明显的正在发生的倾向;
关于expect的固定搭配: expect to do…/sth. is expected to do…/…expect that sth. will do /it is expected that sth. will do /eg. Inflation rose more than we expected. /There is an expectation that……
WRONG:sth. is expected for it to do./ It is expected that sth.should do.
a) and d) are wrong because of the participle 'placing', which wrongly indicates that this trend is already placing more women in leadership positions.
非限定性定语从句里which不是可以指代整个句子吗
不可以呀,comma+which就近修饰名词
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
从主句意思区分AB选项,A主句主体为women,B主体是the majority of students。应该说学生的大多数预计是女性,而不是女性预计是学生的大多数。
【that will ultimately place xxx】是主句已经发生并完成很久后才能实现的,如果想用placing伴随状语,二者时间范围必须是same的,因此AD错
Eexpect用法不对,E错
C which will... 成了修饰woman的,C错
正在发生和预计会发生的结果。
a is wrong because of the participle 'placing', which wrongly indicates that this trend is already placing more women in leadership positions.
c is wrong because the relative pronoun 'which' is placed in a position where it must refer to 'women'. this is wrong for 2 different reasons: (a) 'which' can't refer to people, and (b) according to the sentence, women don't place themselves in leadership positions; the trend does.
AB区分:
ing修饰符必须采用句子中...的时间范围。,该句子中的所有内容与“放置女性...”的时间范围相同。但是这种安置要等到句子中的其他所有内容都在之后才发生-在这些女性成为学生很多年之后。所以AD不对。
C和E中的which,修饰了整个句子,排除。,真正“be expected”的是学生的构成,而不是“women”。
d
ing表伴随或结果,那么时间上的逻辑必须是已发生或正在发生的事,而这个trend的动作是一个预期,就不能用doing修饰,必须用will的各种形式
all you need to know, there, is that __ing modifiers have to adopt the timeframe of ... something in the sentence.
NOTHING in that sentence is happening in the same timeframe as "placing women...".
that placement is something that won't occur until well after everything else in the sentence -- many many years after these women are students.
since the __ing modifier doesn't share a timeframe with ANYTHING in the sentence ... it's wrong!