India, like Italy and China, has no single dominant cuisine: Indian food comprises many different styles of cooking, with each a product of their regional influences, from the fiery vegetarian dishes of the south to the Portuguese-influenced Goan cooking of the west, to the more familiar Mogul food of the north.
with each a product of their
with each as a product of its
each products of their
each a product of
each products of
【转载】RON: if "with ____" is modifying xxxxx, then it should be describing some aspect, or sub-component, of xxxxx.【with表示某物的一部分】 here, "each" = each style of cooking. we can't use "with each style of cooking..." to describe "styles of cooking".【此处不能说styles的一部分,所以不能用with】。
"each用单数,排除ACE
each a product是独立主格结构,中间拿掉了is
没有each as a product的说法"
each后跟单数啊!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Ron:The pronoun problem is worse than you might think. E.g., even if the problem said "... each a product of its regional influences", it would still be wrong.
"Regional influences" are vague forces—basically, like the culinary culture of an entire geographical area. These forces don't emanate from, or belong to, any particular person or thing, so it's impossible for any construction of the form "its/their/____'s influences" to make sense here.
each组合是独立主格的特殊用法,不加with,详见https://forum.chasedream.com/thread-912286-1-1.html
【转载】RON: if "with ____" is modifying xxxxx, then it should be describing some aspect, or sub-component, of xxxxx.【with表示某物的一部分】 here, "each" = each style of cooking. we can't use "with each style of cooking..." to describe "styles of cooking".【此处不能说styles的一部分,所以不能用with】。
"each用单数,排除ACE
each a product是独立主格结构,中间拿掉了is
这里each a product of regional influences是什么成分呢
RON: if "with ____" is modifying xxxxx, then it should be describing some aspect, or sub-component, of xxxxx. here, "each" = each style of cooking. we can't use "with each style of cooking..." to describe "styles of cooking".
#each is a pron here. should find the phrase to which it refers#
印度食物包含很多不同的烹饪方式,每一种方式都是地区影响力的产物。两句没有原因/条件/结果/状态等的逻辑关系,所以不能用独立主格。
积累:https://forum.chasedream.com/thread-912286-1-1.html
each后接单数,排除ACE
B,没有这类用法
D correct
India主谓一致杀AC,each+单数去掉E
【转载】RON: if "with ____" is modifying xxxxx, then it should be describing some aspect, or sub-component, of xxxxx.【with表示某物的一部分】 here, "each" = each style of cooking. we can't use "with each style of cooking..." to describe "styles of cooking".【此处不能说styles的一部分,所以不能用with】。注意,each在此题是代词,找到代表的内容
each 后面必须是单数,看清楚
each组合是独立主格的特殊用法,不加with,详见https://forum.chasedream.com/thread-912286-1-1.html;regional influences地区影响力,its不对
是同位语!
each a product是独立主格结构,中间拿掉了is
没有each as a product的说法
each a product of regional influences是独立主格修饰style of cooking, "each" = each style of cooking. 补全后为each (style of cooking is) a product of its regional influences
这个句式是each引导的强调型独立主格
形式为:句子 +复数名词结尾 , each +介词短语/形容词短语/名词短语/-ing形式/-ed形式
这种独立主格结构为了强调句尾的复数名词(也就是style of cooking)
The pronoun problem is worse than you might think. E.g., even if the problem said "... each a product of its regional influences", it would still be wrong.
"Regional influences" are vague forces—basically, like the culinary culture of an entire geographical area. These forces don't emanate from, or belong to, any particular person or thing, so it's impossible for any construction of the form "its/their/____'s influences" to make sense here.
with+名词,如果不是在介宾结构作定语或状语,则还可以引导独立主格结构,如We redoubled our efforts, (with) each man working like two.
独立主格的格式是:(with)+名词+分词/不定式/形容词/副词/介宾短语,表伴随主句发生的原因/条件/伴随发生的事项或补充说明主句
A,with each+product,错误,同时each是单数,后面不用their;
B,with each as a product of its……,with each+介宾结构作独立主格,修饰印度食物包含很多种类这个句子,语意上=with each style of cooking as product of influence=每种烹饪类型作为地区影响力的产物,主从句在逻辑关系上不属于独立主格表示的原因/条件/伴随发生的事项或补充说明里的任何一种,错误
D是同位语,解释说明先行词style,each a product of=each style of cooking (是)a product of influence,每种烹饪类型都是地区影响力的产物,ok
“独立主格结构”是由名词或代词作为逻辑主语,加上分词、形容词、副词、动词不定式或介词短语作为逻辑谓语构成。这种结构在形式上与主句没有关系,通常称为“独立主格结构”。
虽然叫做独立主格结构,并不是真正的独立,它还是一种从属分句,在句中有多种作用。如:表原因、表条件、表方式、表伴随、表时间等,在句中起状语作用。
我觉得这里用with没错,但是问题在于its regional influences 的表述是错误的。
独立主格是要修饰主句的,这里不是要修饰印度菜有很多种类这件事,而是在解释说明这些种类—每一种都是地区影响力的产物,用定语或同位语。借着你的回复,把这个题又做了一遍,做对了,哈哈哈。
its influences应该是可以的,比如my books
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
同位语和状语的区别:描述的是product的口味,与原句的comprise这个动作没有任何修饰的逻辑关系,因此不能用介词作状语,而要用同位语去解释都有什么styles
"Regional influences" are vague forces—basically, like the culinary culture of an entire geographical area. These forces don't emanate from, or belong to, any particular person or thing, so it's impossible for any construction of the form "its/their/____'s influences" to make sense here.
influences前面加所有格是不合适的