扫描二维码，直接登录
题库 / Prep2007E1-SC-125
The computer company registered a $16 million net loss for the year, largely because it was profitable only overseas, where much of their profits were used for paying higher taxes, while continuing to lose money in North America.
where much of their profits were used for paying higher taxes, while continuing
where much of their profits went to pay higher taxes, as they continued
where much of its profit went to pay higher taxes, while it continued
with much of their profits going to pay higher taxes, while continuing
with much of the profit used for paying higher taxes, as it continued
还没有题目讲解（毕出老师会陆续发布对官方考题的解读，请保持关注）。
1.with作为独立主格结构，功能类似于一个带有自己主语的状语从句，往前修饰it was profitable overseas。 然而从逻辑上1）在海外盈利 和2）利润都用于支付高昂的税金 ；这两句话并不具备修饰关系。where修饰overseas更好
2."used to pay", because the profits were directly used to pay the taxes.
RON ("Used for __ing" is more indirect. E.g., My father uses this chair for watching television, but my father uses his eyes to watch television.)
A, B, D, 很好排除，因为their无指代对象
B是定语，修饰overseas, 公司在海外是盈利的，但是在北美公司继续亏损，句意清楚
E是状语，修饰was profitable; as后接的句子，作连词，有像，因为，当的意思，公司在海外是盈利的，当/因为/像公司在北美继续亏损，不合逻辑
与company主谓一致杀ABD
E、with的独立主格结构变了句意，把在海外税高的意思偷换为所有的（暗指）税高
【转自XDF】
(C) 正确，关系副词where引导定语从句修饰名词overseas，went to pay…清楚地表达了profit的用途，while it continued表达了转折对比关系。
(D) with… +现在分词结构不能清楚地表达与overseas的关系;表示状态的动词continue不能用现在进行时态。
(E) with…+过去分词结构不能清楚地表达与overseas的关系;as作连词表示“当…时，随着”，改变了原句要表达“然而”的转折对比含义;be used for paying名词形式不如动词形式更简洁有效。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
用with变成了修饰主句，这里应该修饰的是地点，所以用where。
1.with作为独立主格结构，功能类似于一个带有自己主语的状语从句，往前修饰it was profitable overseas。 然而从逻辑上1）在海外盈利 和2）利润都用于支付高昂的税金 ；这两句话并不具备修饰关系。where修饰overseas更好
2.while是连词，连接两个完整句子，如A所写作伴随，句间关系上也不对
used to pay; went to pay both Ok. used for paying , wrong
Ron: Used for __ing" is more indirect. E.g., My father uses this chair for watching television, but my father uses his eyes to watch television.
1.with作为独立主格结构，功能类似于一个带有自己主语的状语从句，往前修饰it was profitable overseas。 然而从逻辑上1）在海外盈利 和2）利润都用于支付高昂的税金 ；这两句话并不具备修饰关系。where修饰overseas更好
2.while是连词，连接两个完整句子
D时态不对
1. North America不包括在overseas里！公司在海外盈利在本国亏损，而海外的盈利都被用来支付tax了
2. The computer company registered a $16 million net loss for the year, largely because it was profitable only overseas, while it continued to lose money in North America.
used to pay; went to pay both Ok. used for paying , wrong
Ron: Used for __ing" is more indirect. E.g., My father uses this chair for watching television, but my father uses his eyes to watch television.
独立主格怎么不行了
the usage of with should modify the preceding parts, offering some extra information.
But the usage does not make sense, because the non-underlined part talks about losses, and the with part talks about the usage of profit. ( it shouldn't serve as a modifier to the non-underlined part since there is no logical relationship there)
句意理解错了。。。我以为是说海外转的钱都用来交北美的税所以亏了。。。
CE区分：
独立主格with much of the profit used for paying higher taxes, 往前修饰it was profitable overseas。 然而从逻辑上1）在海外盈利 和2）利润都用于支付高昂的税金 ；这两句话并不具备修饰关系
much/much of:
much指很多，much of指某物中的大部分，二者都跟不可数名词，与little/little of对应。
many/many of：
many指很多，many of指某群体中的很多，很大部分，接可数名词复数，与few/a few of对应。如：
Many girls like ice cream.很多女生喜欢吃冰激凌
Many of the girls in my class like ice cream.我们班的女生中有很多喜欢吃冰激凌.
1.with作为独立主格结构，功能类似于一个带有自己主语的状语从句，往前修饰it was profitable overseas。 然而从逻辑上1）在海外盈利 和2）利润都用于支付高昂的税金 ；这两句话并不具备修饰关系。where修饰overseas更好
2."used to pay", because the profits were directly used to pay the taxes.
RON ("Used for __ing" is more indirect. E.g., My father uses this chair for watching television, but my father uses his eyes to watch television.)
choice e: 独立主格with much of the profit used for paying higher taxes, 往前修饰it was profitable overseas。 然而从逻辑上1）在海外盈利 和2）利润都用于支付高昂的税金 ；这两句话并不具备修饰关系
可以把"where xxxx"这段话当做插入语，前面是“largely because it was xxx”，后面是“while it continued xxx"——平行。为C
独立主格表示事情发生的条件、原因、伴随发生的情况，及解释说明主句，但不能表示转折和对比。
拟人化的用法，profit went to pay higher taxes。its their是a c的区别