Among lower-paid workers, union members are less likely than nonunion members to be enrolled in lower-end insurance plans imposing stricter limits on medical services and requiring doctors to see more patients, and spend less time with each.
imposing stricter limits on medical services and requiring doctors to see more patients, and spend
imposing stricter limits on medical services, requiring doctors to see more patients, and spending
that impose stricter limits on medical services, require doctors to see more patients, and spend
that impose stricter limits on medical services and require doctors to see more patients, spending
that impose stricter limits on medical services, requiring doctors to see more patients and spending
a)impose stricter limits on medical services
b) require doctors to see more patients, and
c)spend less time with each.
in these a and b are independent and c is dependent on b....
C makes all a ,b ,c independent...... E makes b and c dependent on a..
only D makes a and b independent and c dependent on b.. therefore D is the ans...
Is "imposing" modifying "lower-end insurance plans" or is it modifying "union members" or "non union members"????
The construction "preposition + noun + present participle" creates this confusion.
所以意思是伴随状语的主语是离他最近的谓语的主语而不是离它最近的句子的主语?
不一定,要看语义。登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
1. 不是嵌入式关系分句啊,先行词做主语嘛。2. 是的。
伴随状语不是应该修饰主句的谓语吗?是“就近”原则更强?
打完知道怎么回事了,但是删不掉啦。。。。
是怎么回事,我还不太懂
理论上是可以修饰主语的动作的,但这道题很明显考的是平行内容的区分,spending不在平行中,而作状语修饰挨着的平行结构的动词。我们用排除法选择的E。同样关于状语,我们看选项A和B,imposing可以作plan的后置定语,也可以作为主句动词union members are less likely than 的伴随状语,引起的歧义是非常明显的。不知道我的回答是否于你在判断状语修饰这个问题上有所帮助。登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论