The British sociologist and activist Barbara Wootton once noted as a humorous example of income maldistribution that the elephant that gave rides to children at the Whipsnade Zoo was earning annually exactly what she then earned as director of adult education for London.
that the elephant that gave rides to children at the Whipsnade Zoo was earning
that the elephant, giving rides to children at the Whipsnade Zoo, had been earning
that there was an elephant giving rides to children at the Whipsnade Zoo, and it earned
the elephant that gave rides to children at the Whipsnade Zoo and was earning
the elephant giving rides to children at the Whipsnade Zoo and that it earned
补充一下lz所说的第一点:限制性定语从句(“that”)和非限制性定语从句(“,which”)的区别。所谓限制性定语从句就是能够缩小前面被修饰词的范围的(the elephant that gave rides to children at the Whipsnade Zoo从泛指的elephant,到公园里给人骑的elephant,缩小了范围);而非限制性定语从句不会缩小被修饰词的范围(the elephant, giving rides to children at the Whipsnade Zoo, 给人的感觉是所有的elephant都是在公园里被人骑的)。在判断时要关注句子的逻辑意思。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论