The investigations of many psychologists and anthropologists support the generalization of there being little that is a significant difference in the underlying mental processes manifested by people from different cultures.
of there being little that is a significant difference
of there being little that is significantly different
of little that is significantly different
that there is little that is significantly different
that there is little of significant differences
generalization,一般性,普遍化,抽象名词,用that引导的同位语来解释,
E,little修饰不可数名词,不能修饰可数名词
D,sth is adj in some place是可以的,in some place作地点状语修饰句子,不一定要there is sth in some place
如:Animals are lively in the zoo.
AB:核心主干generalization of being
C: 核心主干generalization of little
E: difference 是可数名词不能用little形容
in this sentence, “little" functions as a noun. you can use "much" in the same way: there is much that is different...
little of加不可数名词
little of 后面加不可数名词,不能加可数名词复数。
注意little修饰不可数名词 differences此处时可数名词 排E
significant 重大的 significantly 程度深的
little修饰不可数名词
C 和D 的区别就是有没有从句
C 支持一个少数的概论结论
D 支持一个结论,同位语从句 语义传达合理
ron的解释:
diomatic usage. In the phrase \'little of X\', the X has to be a singular quantity. If it\'s plural (like \'differences\'), then you have to use few.
There was very little food left over at the end of the party.
There were very few crab cakes left over at the end of the party.
快速排出的方法:little修饰不可数,排出E。
significant:a.重要的,significantly:adv.很大程度地
little作名词,n.少数。没有多少。
generalization不能different from别的
abc排
little修饰单数,又排
little of + 不可数名词
所以排除选项E。
笔记:in this sentence, “little" functions as a noun. you can use "much" in the same way: there is much that is different...
in this sentence, “little" functions as a noun. you can use "much" in the same way: there is much that is different...
mark
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
E中修饰differences的是形容词significant,这个词的意思是“意义重大的”,而D中的significantly是副词,意思是“程度深地”。在这道题目中,意思上肯定是”程度上十分大的不同“,所以E是不对的。
little of +单数
little of significant differences little不修饰differences
the most objective error in choice (e) is its use of "little" for a quantity of differences.
differences (like virtually all plural nouns) are countable, so you can't use "little" to describe them. if this choice said few significant differences, it would be legitimate.
e.g., my grandmother doesn't like the idea of combat sports.
in the case of generalization, though, you can't follow it with "of" + noun, because generalizations aren't represented by nouns -- they are represented by statements (clauses). you can introduce a clause with "that", but not with "of".
ABC
this is just idiomatic. fortunately, it's pretty much consistent across the board for words that refer to things that people say or think. for example, you would use the same construction with the idea that..., the saying that..., etc..
some of these constructions can also work with "of" + noun, if that kind of thing makes sense in context. for instance, idea + of + noun can be used:
little of 要加单书