Nikola Tesla, the inventor of alternating current, because he was excited with the prospects of harnessing Niagara Falls for producing electric power, he predicted in the mid-1890's that electricity generated at Niagara would one day power the streetcars of London and the streetlights of Paris.
Nikola Tesla, the inventor of alternating current, because he was excited with the prospects of harnessing Niagara Falls for producing electric power, he
The prospects of harnessing Niagara Falls to produce electric power was exciting to Nikola Tesla, the inventor of alternating current, and so he
Excited about the prospects of harnessing Niagara Falls to produce electric power, Nikola Tesla, the inventor of alternating current,
Nikola Tesla, the inventor of alternating current, excited about the prospects of harnessing Niagara Falls for the production of electric power and
The inventor of alternating current, excited with the prospects of harnessing Niagara Falls for producing of electric power, Nikola Tesla
(e) 的硬伤是excited with吗?
还有一个问题就是the inventor of aletrnating current是nikola tesla的同位语,两个隔太远了
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
(D) for doing结构表示目的不及to do有效; excited about…是形容词结构,如果要与predicted平行作动词,需要加be动词,否则结构不完整。
d excited不是完整的谓语动词(缺be动词),无法和predicted并列
错选D,excited无论做什么都需要be动词
B选项主谓不一致
D ① harness 约束力较强,不定式to do ;② excited不是完整的谓语动词(缺be动词),无法和predicted并列
D ① harness 约束力较强,不定式to do ;② excited不是完整的谓语动词(缺be动词),无法和predicted并列
看到excited 跟主语,一下就把c排除了,其实它是个形容词结构是吧?
可能是状语?
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
prospect约束力强,所以用to do 对吗?
这里的to do 和for doing 结构是否是外延和内涵,我觉得约束力很弱啊。。。。为啥还用to do 呢
抓住瑞姐!
to do 是由harness 约束力控制,这里利用瀑布肯定会控制瀑布发电,属于强约束力
哈哈哈一直没人理我 谢谢星洲答疑解惑!!
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
D选项是不是因为excited 前面少了一个be动词所以无法并列呢
我觉得你说得很对,and身前并没有谓语。
如果要与predicted平行,作动词的话,就需要加be动词,否则结构不完整。
Ron解释的有道理,D这个选项创造的错误的平行。如果在excited 前面加一个got,就对了
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论