The proliferation of so-called cybersquatters, people who register the Internet domain names of high-profile companies in hopes of reselling the rights to those names for a profit, led to passing the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act in 1999, allowing companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent of selling them later.
passing the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act in 1999, allowing companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent of selling
the passage of the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act in 1999, which allows companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent that they will sell
the passage in 1999 of the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, which allows companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent of selling
the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, which was passed in 1999, and it allows companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent to sell
the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, passed in 1999 and allowing companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent of selling
a, passing这里是名词还是动名词??如果是作名词,前面需要加上the passing,而且passing有自己的名词形式,passage;allowing作伴随状语,逻辑主语也不可能是people,只能是法案; in 1999紧跟act,造成一种1999年的法案的感觉
b, in 1999修饰歧义同a, they的指代对象不清,前面的复数名词太多
c, 句子主干是proliferation led to the act, and it allows...这里it语法上指代proliferation,但是实际指代act
e, passed和allowing的逻辑主语是谁?如果是伴随状语,逻辑主语是proliferation,如果是修饰act,逻辑主语就是act,所以两个非谓语动词用逗号隔开,没有紧跟修饰对象,会有歧义
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论