The proliferation of so-called cybersquatters, people who register the Internet domain names of high-profile companies in hopes of reselling the rights to those names for a profit, led to passing the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act in 1999, allowing companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent of selling them later.
passing the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act in 1999, allowing companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent of selling
the passage of the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act in 1999, which allows companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent that they will sell
the passage in 1999 of the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, which allows companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent of selling
the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, which was passed in 1999, and it allows companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent to sell
the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, passed in 1999 and allowing companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent of selling
主要考点:平行 VS 副词修饰;纯名词VS Ving;修饰歧义
语义:域名抢注会导致….,造成…
语法:
D选项:原句强调的是颁布法案后带来的伴随结果,and连接表示两件独立事件,不符合句意。排除;
E选项:and allowing没有平行对象。排除
A选项:对比BE,强调名词用passing,没有passage纯名词好。排除
C选项:in 1999放置位置在句中,有歧义。排除
答案是C啊 不是A啊
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论