Evolutionary psychology holds that the human mind is not a "blank slate," but instead that it comprises specialized mental mechanisms that were developed as a way of solving specific problems human ancestors faced millions of years ago.
the human mind is not a "blank slate," but instead that it comprises specialized mental mechanisms that were developed as a way of solving
the human mind is not a "blank slate" but instead comprises specialized mental mechanisms that were developed to solve
the human mind, instead of a "blank slate," it comprises specialized mental mechanisms that have been developed to solve
rather than it being a "blank slate," the human mind comprises specialized mental mechanisms that have been developed as a way of solving
rather than the human mind's being a "blank slate," that it comprises specialized mental mechanisms that were developed as a way of solving
A,they hold that, but instead that=they hold that, but instead they hold that,表示他们认为两件事情。这里说的是他们认为人类思维不是空盘,而是其他东西,认为的是一件事情。是人类思维有两个性质,所以not/but放在human mind后面。
1. instead是副词,可以省,不冲突;
2.not ... but... 并不是平行触发
3. rather than不能引导独立主格
E,it的antecedent不能是所有格:human mind’s,
D,rather than不能引导独立主格,it多余且错误
A:but连接了两个that引导的宾语从句,表示转折关系
B:not...but...平行
C:the human mind & it双主语
这里考察的不是not but,而是but的平行。
be developed to solve也更简洁
not……but……并列
C、run-on结构(双主语)
a way to do优于of doing
E、有that,前面的rather句就不合理
A、but instead that it怎么解释都不合理
个人想法:not。。but。。主要看not是在主语前还是后,not在主语前的话,but后面要接主语;not在主语后,but后不接主语
mechanisms可以和a way对应吗?
not but 暗示考对称;对同一个话句的不同表达,考准确精炼。
A/B: 一个是作为一种方式被发展,解决问题作为方式的定语,处于第二层;一个是被发展来解决问题,后者逻辑更清晰。
还是用提句子主干的方法。
A/B:人类思维不是空盘,而是包含了一套机制,这两个性质都是人类思维的性质,应该跟在一个主语后面表述,而不是分成两个句子,将主语“人类思维”重复一遍。
A/B solve的逻辑主语差异:A的介宾是没有逻辑主语的,即作为一种方式,无论是谁来解决人类祖先面临的问题;B,to do如果有for sb,则承接sb做主语,如果没有,则承接主句的主语或宾语做主语(取决于to do做状语还是定语/宾补等),B的主句是没有逻辑主语的被动式,所以to do也无法承接主句主语。两个选项的solve都没有逻辑主语。
1.這裡的平行對稱不是 "not X but Y";而是 "X but Y".
the human mind is not a "blank slate" but instead comprises…結構是平行的
2. instead 位置: Instead前面是直接對比否定句(針對not a blank slate作對比);如果,Instead 副詞修飾comprised整件事,即擺在that的外面,會變成往前平行修飾holds that 顯然對比的對象就錯了!
3.精簡: 直接用to V 不僅簡短 也傳達出採行目的 相形下, as the way of solving 用動名詞加上重複概念the way來傳達同一件事就劣於前者~
not, but instead是对的
not but rather 是不对的
并列结构不是“not X but Y”, 而是“X but Y"
A, sth holds that the human mind is not a "blank slate," but (it holds) that it comprises specialized mental mechanisms
B, sth holds that the human mind is not a "blank slate" but (the human mind) comprises specialized mental mechanisms
理论认为人类思想不是空盘,而认为它包含特殊机制;理论认为人类思想不是空盘,而是包含了特殊机制,不是理论持有的观点这件事发生了转折,而是理论持有观点的内容发生了转折:人类思想不是……,而是……,
~
讲的太好了!
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
想问一下这句话but的转折含义在哪里体现出来啊?如果这句话的结构是 ... holds that A but B, 那 human mind is not blank plate 和human mind comprises specialized mental mechanism 应该存在转折才对,但这两个说的是一个意思啊?人类的思想不是白纸,人类的思想中遗留着先祖解决问题的机制。我认为这句话仍然是一个not but 结构,其中两部分是 is blank plate 和 comprises specialize mental mechanism, 对前否定对后肯定,但是not和is 的顺序是固定的,所以调换成is not blank plate。
A 感觉错在“that”多余。因为instead本身只有“instead”和“instead of”两种用法,若去掉instead看句子,"but that it comprises..."错误。
RON:in this sentence, the parallel structure is not actually "not X but Y"; it's just "X but Y".
not..but..应该是封闭式平行。instead是个副词,可以去掉的。
the human mind is not a "blank slate" but instead comprises…结构平行; 用developed to solve表达目的,简洁
这个题错了..第一遍判断的时候觉得but 和 instead 有重复的嫌疑...但其实是没有的...
这个题和这一套中的另一道sc很像,出现了not...but...但并不表示not only...but also的含义,所以也就不存在什么平行
考虑句意即可
not... but instead 是ok的
not, but instead是对的
not but rather 是不对的 记混了....