扫描二维码，直接登录
题库 / Prep2007E1-SC-99
A study of food resources in the North Pacific between 1989 and 1996 revealed that creatures of the seabed were suffering from dwindling food supplies, possibly resulting from increasing sea surface temperatures during the same period.
that creatures of the seabed were suffering from dwindling food supplies, possibly resulting from increasing
that creatures of the seabed were suffering because food supplies were dwindling, possibly as a result of an increase in
that creatures of the seabed were suffering because of food supplies, which were dwindling possibly as a result of increasing
creatures of the seabed that were suffering from food supplies that were dwindling, possibly resulting from an increase in
creatures of the seabed that were suffering because food supplies were dwindling, which possibly resulted from increasing
题目分析：
本题虽然属于难题，但是考点较为容易识别，属于常考题型。
选项分析：
A选项：虽然suffer和from是固定搭配，但是本选项中from身后dwindling food supplies的核心词是错误的。在逻辑上，suffer from身后的内容应该是suffer的原因。本题中海床生物受灾的原因应是“食物供给的变坏”，而不是“食物供给”。试想，只有供给变坏，才能导致受灾，而食物供给本身是中性的，不会导致生物受灾。另外，动名词短语increasing sea surface temperatures during the same period需改为名词短语an increase in sea surface temperatures during the same period，这点考查了名词和动名词的区别，用之于本题，increase这个动作的时间已经被状语 during the same period规定了发生时间段，因此increase必然有时间终止点。
B选项：Correct.本选项在语法和逻辑上均是正确的。possibly as a result of an increase是food supplies were dwindling的状语。
C选项：because of身后的核心词为food supplies，本选项错误同(A)。动名词短语increasing sea surface temperatures during the same period错误同(A)。
D选项：reveal的宾语 creatures of the seabed that were suffering from food supplies that were dwindling的核心词为creatures of the seabed，一个对食物供给的研究应该揭示的是海床生物的某种情况而不是单纯的一个生物。
E选项：本选项错误同(D)；动名词短语increasing sea surface temperatures during the same period错误同(A)。
a）possibly resulting from修饰的是were suffering，逻辑不对，应该是海温度上升导致食物供给变坏，食物供给变坏导致生物suffer
b）possibly resulting from修饰的是were dwindling，ok
c）抽主干翻译为生物suffer食物供给，逻辑不对
dwindling 只做一个修饰成分，而语义上应该作为对象，因此A错误。
a）possibly resulting from修饰的是were suffering，逻辑不对，应该是海温度上升导致食物供给变坏，食物供给变坏导致生物suffer
b）possibly resulting from修饰的是were dwindling，ok
A. resulting from increasing ... 的主语是creatures of the seabed，变成了creatures of the seabed由increasing sea surface temperatures导致，错误
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
D和E: 找核心词，revealed creatures，语义错误。
A: 找核心词，were suffering from (dwindling) food supplies，语义错误。
C: 找核心词，as a result of (increasing) creatures，语义错误。
要区分是因为一件“事情”还是因为一个“东西”，然后找核心词，常见的错误是把一件”事情“只用一个”东西“代替了。
V-ing + Noun的结构，核心词是后面的Noun。如果要表示一件“事情”，要把V-ing + Noun结构换成句子形式，或者把V-ing名词化。
suffer的原因应该是食物供给变坏而不是食物供给，找核心词大意了
during the same period为increase规定了时间终止，所以要用名词好一点
dwindle v.减少 是个动词而不是形容词
creature suffer from dwindling food supply. 减少食物供给的动作发出者是谁？？？不可能是creature去减少了食物供给
"result from不可以做伴随状语，排除AD
which不可以指代句子，排除E
原因是温度的增加，重点是增加，而不是增加的温度。排除C"
A.from身后dwindling food supplies的核心词是错误的。在逻辑上，suffer from身后的内容应该是suffer的原因。本题中海床生物受灾的原因应是“食物供给的变坏”，而不是“食物供给”。
虽然suffer和from是固定搭配，但是本选项中from身后dwindling food supplies的核心词是错误的。在逻辑上，suffer from身后的内容应该是suffer的原因。本题中海床生物受灾的原因应是“食物供给的变坏”，而不是“食物供给”。试想，只有供给变坏，才能导致受灾，而食物供给本身是中性的，不会导致生物受灾。
possibly as a result of an increase是food supplies were dwindling的状语。
抓住核心词，food supply不是原因！food supply was dwindling才是原因
2）suffer from后面可以接动词的名词化，如Many companies are suffering from a shortage of skilled staff. 但A中were suffering from dwindling food supplies的主结构是were suffering from food supplies，不是在遭受食物供应，是在遭受食物供应的短缺，应该说were suffering from a dwindling of food supplies或者were suffering because food supplies were dwindling
resulting from永远不能做伴随状语，因为-ing做伴随状语要么表示伴随的动作，要么表示伴随的结果，resulting from接原因，两种情况都不符合。resulting from只能不加逗号做定语修饰名词
action noun、 complex gerund和simple gerund的区别：
前二者类似于名词，强调结果，后者强调过程。
起源于海洋温度的增加，是起源于海洋温度增加这个既定事情，而不是起源于温度增加这个过程，所以resulting from increasing、a result of increasing等使用simple gerund都是错的，a result of an increase属于complex gerund，跟名词一样，指代增加这个结果。
名次和动名词的区别：强调过程还是结果
1、核心词：碰到同一个短语把v放成不同形式的表述，要根据语义辨别核心词
2、名词和动名词的区别：动作有规定始终，名词
无名显始终，ving
A，resulting from永远不能做伴随状语，因为-ing做伴随状语要么表示伴随的动作，要么表示伴随的结果，resulting from接原因，两种情况都不符合。resulting from只能不加逗号做定语修饰名词；提主干，suffer from supplies，错误
a选项中result后面应跟名词短语，而非动名词；同时，suffer from后面跟的应该是核心词，在该句中应该是食物供给的变化，而非食物供给
c选项错误同a（核心词的问题）
resulting from the increase
又读了一遍，a逻辑错误，
resulting from修饰的前面一整个分句，意思变成了 the creature suffer from。。。， 修饰主语the creature，不对，这里应该用名词result修饰dwindling
ab选错。
虽然suffer和from是固定搭配，但是本选项中from身后dwindling food supplies的核心词是错误的。在逻辑上，suffer from身后的内容应该是suffer的原因。本题中海床生物受灾的原因应是“食物供给的变坏”，而不是因为“食物供给”， 核心词应该是dwindling
。
increase这个动作的时间已经被状语 during the same period规定了发生时间段，因此increase必然有时间终止点。所以用an increase.因为文中有固定时间线。
action noun、 complex gerund和simple gerund的区别：
前二者类似于名词，强调结果，后者强调过程。
起源于海洋温度的增加，是起源于海洋温度增加这个既定事情，而不是起源于温度增加这个过程，所以resulting from increasing、a result of increasing等使用simple gerund都是错的，a result of an increase属于complex gerund，跟名词一样，指代增加这个结果。