Some airlines allegedly reduce fares on certain routes to a level at which they lose money, in order to drive competitors off those routes. However, this method of eliminating competition cannot be profitable in the long run. Once an airline successfully implements this method, any attempt to recoup the earlier losses by charging high fares on that route for an extended period would only provide competitors with a better opportunity to undercut the airline's fares.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
In some countries it is not illegal for a company to drive away competitors by selling a product below cost.
Airline executives generally believe that a company that once underpriced its fares to drive away competitors is very likely to do so again if new competitors emerge.
As part of promotions designed to attract new customers, airlines sometimes reduce their ticket prices to below an economically sustainable level.
On deciding to stop serving particular routes, most airlines shift resources to other routes rather than reduce the size of their operations.
When airlines dramatically reduce their fares on a particular route, the total number of air passengers on that route increases greatly.
方案推理
目标:赶走竞争者
方案:采取降价的方式
评估方向一定与方案有关要求削弱推论就是要求加强方案
a,说这种方案违法,削弱了方案
b,竞争者认为一个使用降价策略的公司,它还会继续使用降价策略当竞争再出现的时候,所以竞争者就不再去竞争了。加强了方案的可行性
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论