扫描二维码，直接登录
题库 / Prep2007E2-CR-15
Some airlines allegedly reduce fares on certain routes to a level at which they lose money, in order to drive competitors off those routes. However, this method of eliminating competition cannot be profitable in the long run. Once an airline successfully implements this method, any attempt to recoup the earlier losses by charging high fares on that route for an extended period would only provide competitors with a better opportunity to undercut the airline's fares.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
In some countries it is not illegal for a company to drive away competitors by selling a product below cost.
Airline executives generally believe that a company that once underpriced its fares to drive away competitors is very likely to do so again if new competitors emerge.
As part of promotions designed to attract new customers, airlines sometimes reduce their ticket prices to below an economically sustainable level.
On deciding to stop serving particular routes, most airlines shift resources to other routes rather than reduce the size of their operations.
When airlines dramatically reduce their fares on a particular route, the total number of air passengers on that route increases greatly.
航空公司通过对航线降价到盈利水平以下的价格驱赶竞争公司
P: 之后任何对降价航线的涨价行为都会导致竞争者回来-> C: 这种模式不能长久持续下去
choice b, 任何通过降价方式驱逐竞争者的公司，当新竞争者再出现的时候很有可能还会这么做。-> correct, 航空公司不会只降一次价格
choice e, 当航空公司对特定航线降价，那条航线上面的乘客人数会激增。-> irrelevant, as the argument doesn't turn on what happens during the low-fare period (its most important premises concern what happens after prices are raised back)
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论