Some airlines allegedly reduce fares on certain routes to a level at which they lose money, in order to drive competitors off those routes. However, this method of eliminating competition cannot be profitable in the long run. Once an airline successfully implements this method, any attempt to recoup the earlier losses by charging high fares on that route for an extended period would only provide competitors with a better opportunity to undercut the airline's fares.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
In some countries it is not illegal for a company to drive away competitors by selling a product below cost.
Airline executives generally believe that a company that once underpriced its fares to drive away competitors is very likely to do so again if new competitors emerge.
As part of promotions designed to attract new customers, airlines sometimes reduce their ticket prices to below an economically sustainable level.
On deciding to stop serving particular routes, most airlines shift resources to other routes rather than reduce the size of their operations.
When airlines dramatically reduce their fares on a particular route, the total number of air passengers on that route increases greatly.
因:一旦航空公司提升价格来弥补降价的损失,其他竞争对手就可以以更低的价格销售
果:长期不会盈利
因果题,驳斥结论,即长期仍可以盈利
B选项由于高管认为一旦新的竞争者出现,仍会采取降价,因此符合前提“通过降价来减少竞争对手”
E选项表示总乘客会增多,但由于新的竞争者出现,乘客不一定会去坐自己的航班
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论