扫描二维码，直接登录
题库 / Prep2007E2-CR-17
At present the Hollywood Restaurant has only standard-height tables. However, many customers come to watch the celebrities who frequent the Hollywood, and they would prefer tall tables with stools because such seating would afford a better view of the celebrities. Moreover, diners seated on stools typically do not stay as long as diners seated at standard-height tables. Therefore, if the Hollywood replaced some of its seating with high tables and stools, its profits would increase.
The argument is vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it gives reason to believe that it is likely that
some celebrities come to the Hollywood to be seen, and so might choose to sit at the tall tables if they were available
the price of meals ordered by celebrities dining at the Hollywood compensates for the longer time, if any, they spend lingering over their meals
a customer of the Hollywood who would choose to sit at a tall table would be an exception to the generalization about lingering
a restaurant's customers who spend less time at their meals typically order less expensive meals than those who remain at their meals longer
with enough tall tables to accommodate all the Hollywood's customers interested in such seating, there would be no view except of other tall tables
这道题tricky的地方在于问题的问法——文章论点是易受攻击的，因为文章认为……
接下来的选项应该是讨论文章的逻辑漏洞，直接问你GAP是什么。
P——大家喜欢做高凳子看名人
P——大家再高凳子上不会多做逗留
C——引入高凳子会让饭店的收入增加
错误选项分析D——文章是有缺陷的，因为文章暗示——逗留的人比不逗留的的人花费更多。错误。我们可以用这个来攻击，但是文章本身没有这个意思，他总不可能自己攻击自己吧。如果原文改成——we have reasons to believe，就可以选这个
C——文章错误的认为做高凳子的人不会逗留，这个是文章当中的论据。不管这句话再暗示什么，内在逻辑是什么。首先这个格式就对了。比如A说因为B所以C，A是易受攻击的因为A认为B是对的。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论