At present the Hollywood Restaurant has only standard-height tables. However, many customers come to watch the celebrities who frequent the Hollywood, and they would prefer tall tables with stools because such seating would afford a better view of the celebrities. Moreover, diners seated on stools typically do not stay as long as diners seated at standard-height tables. Therefore, if the Hollywood replaced some of its seating with high tables and stools, its profits would increase.
The argument is vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it gives reason to believe that it is likely that
some celebrities come to the Hollywood to be seen, and so might choose to sit at the tall tables if they were available
the price of meals ordered by celebrities dining at the Hollywood compensates for the longer time, if any, they spend lingering over their meals
a customer of the Hollywood who would choose to sit at a tall table would be an exception to the generalization about lingering
a restaurant's customers who spend less time at their meals typically order less expensive meals than those who remain at their meals longer
with enough tall tables to accommodate all the Hollywood's customers interested in such seating, there would be no view except of other tall tables
这个题的问法很tricky ,他说这段话是错的因为它相信。。所以说,应该选能表达文段意思的选项。文段意思是:高桌有better view 和不会lingering 所以profit上升。选项D说待的时间越久的人点的东西越贵去(其实这句话和的意思很像,价格弥补了她长时间的lingering)这个肯定不是文段所相信的啊,如果文段认为B、D正确,那么profit就不一定是上升了。C说做高桌的人不会lingering,这个就是文段所表达的呀,相当于同义替换了
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论