扫描二维码，直接登录
题库 / Prep2007E2-CR-17
At present the Hollywood Restaurant has only standard-height tables. However, many customers come to watch the celebrities who frequent the Hollywood, and they would prefer tall tables with stools because such seating would afford a better view of the celebrities. Moreover, diners seated on stools typically do not stay as long as diners seated at standard-height tables. Therefore, if the Hollywood replaced some of its seating with high tables and stools, its profits would increase.
The argument is vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it gives reason to believe that it is likely that
some celebrities come to the Hollywood to be seen, and so might choose to sit at the tall tables if they were available
the price of meals ordered by celebrities dining at the Hollywood compensates for the longer time, if any, they spend lingering over their meals
a customer of the Hollywood who would choose to sit at a tall table would be an exception to the generalization about lingering
a restaurant's customers who spend less time at their meals typically order less expensive meals than those who remain at their meals longer
with enough tall tables to accommodate all the Hollywood's customers interested in such seating, there would be no view except of other tall tables
把题干简化一下，The argument is vulnerable to criticism because it gives reason to believe that it is likely that，“文中的论述是有问题的，因为文段中的推论让我们有理由相信（以下哪个事件可能会发生）
对比起来，” D-停留时间短的顾客会花更少的钱“，如果问题是XXvulnerable because this argument is established On which consumption 那这个选项就是对的
E-乍一看好像是对的，但是原文中提到只打算替换some table，错误
C 在Hollywood选高脚凳坐的客人会是例外（会停留更长的时间）”，正确
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论