扫描二维码，直接登录
题库 / Prep2007E2-CR-23
A product that represents a clear technological advance over competing products can generally command a high price. Because technological advances tend to be quickly surpassed and companies want to make large profits while they still can, many companies charge the maximum possible price for such a product. But large profits on the new product will give competitors a strong incentive to quickly match the new product's capabilities. Consequently, the strategy to maximize overall profit from a new product is to charge less than the greatest possible price.
In the argument above, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
The first is a consideration that has been raised to argue that a certain strategy is counterproductive; the second presents that strategy.
The first is a consideration raised to support the strategy that the argument recommends; the second presents that strategy.
The first is a consideration raised to explain the appeal of a certain strategy; the second presents that strategy.
The first is an assumption, rejected by the argument, that has been used to justify a course of action; the second presents that course of action.
The first is a consideration that has been used to justify pursuing a goal that the argument rejects; the second presents a course of action that has been adopted in pursuit of that goal.
我对这两句话的理解：1.因为科技进步很容易被超越，且公司总是趁着他们还算给力的时候追求利润的最大化，所以公司总是对他们的科技产品尽可能的要高价；2.所以，用于追求新产品整体利润的最大化的策略，就是定价定得比最高可能要价低一点。
开始我也觉得他们是对立关系，因为是采取了完全不同的策略。但读了n遍后我赶脚，第一句更像是呼吁一种解决方案的基本原因（因为公司总是要高价，所以需要解决这个问题），第二句就很好地提出了这个解决方案。B说第一句是直接支持了最后提出的策略，“公司总是要高价“”如何直接支持最后提出的“少要价”策略？个人想法，如有误导请轻喷: ）
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论