A product that represents a clear technological advance over competing products can generally command a high price. Because technological advances tend to be quickly surpassed and companies want to make large profits while they still can, many companies charge the maximum possible price for such a product. But large profits on the new product will give competitors a strong incentive to quickly match the new product's capabilities. Consequently, the strategy to maximize overall profit from a new product is to charge less than the greatest possible price.
In the argument above, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
The first is a consideration that has been raised to argue that a certain strategy is counterproductive; the second presents that strategy.
The first is a consideration raised to support the strategy that the argument recommends; the second presents that strategy.
The first is a consideration raised to explain the appeal of a certain strategy; the second presents that strategy.
The first is an assumption, rejected by the argument, that has been used to justify a course of action; the second presents that course of action.
The first is a consideration that has been used to justify pursuing a goal that the argument rejects; the second presents a course of action that has been adopted in pursuit of that goal.
至于B和C我个人认为,b错在他并不是一个consideration raised to support文章观点,因为1部分作为consideration,推理出来的观点一定是要定最高价,而不是定less最高价
the goal that the argument rejects, 作者本身没有拒绝这个goal
本题选项设置较为微妙。
黑体2many companies charge the maximum possible price for such a product.
开始我也觉得他们是对立关系,因为是采取了完全不同的策略。但读了n遍后我赶脚,第一句更像是呼吁一种解决方案的基本原因(因为公司总是要高价,所以需要解决这个问题),第二句就很好地提出了这个解决方案。B说第一句是直接支持了最后提出的策略,“公司总是要高价“”如何直接支持最后提出的“少要价”策略?个人想法,如有误导请轻喷: )
就是黑1是用来说明黑2的优势的,或者黑 1是用来说明自身劣势的。那么a和d是一个意思吗都是加强,因为有了but就不是加强,难道是套路吗。。。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论