The proposal to hire ten new police officers in Middletown is quite foolish. There is sufficient funding to pay the salaries of the new officers, but not the salaries of additional court and prison employees to process the increased caseload of arrests and convictions that new officers usually generate.
Which of the following, if true, will most seriously weaken the conclusion drawn above?
Studies have shown that an increase in a city's police force does not necessarily reduce crime.
When one major city increased its police force by 19 percent last year, there were 40 percent more arrests and 13 percent more convictions.
If funding for the new police officers' salaries is approved, support for other city services will have to be reduced during the next fiscal year.
In most United States cities, not all arrests result in convictions, and not all convictions result in prison terms.
Middletown's ratio of police officers to citizens has reached a level at which an increase in the number of officers will have a deterrent effect on crime.
為什麼選E啊?
錯選了D:不是所有警官逮捕的人都要判罪拘禁。雖然“所有”這個詞並不好。但E:警官達到威懾水平 和 前提:資金不夠法院監獄 無關啊。
因为hire new police officers会对犯罪有威慑作用,犯罪少了,也不需要逮捕判刑入狱,也不需要为court and prison employees多付salary了。果因推理,CQ2,weaken因果联系。
d的错误更多的在于就算不是所有的抓捕会引起判罪,不是最有的判罪对引起入狱,但是抓捕还是会引起一部分的判罪和入狱,还是肯定有additional salaries。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论