Which of the following most logically completes the passage?
Garnet and RenCo each provide health care for their employees. Garnet pays for both testing of its employees' cholesterol levels and treatment of high cholesterol. This policy saves Garnet money, since high cholesterol left untreated for many years leads to conditions that require very expensive treatment. However, RenCo does not have the same financial incentive to adopt such a policy, because __________.
early treatment of high cholesterol does not entirely eliminate the possibility of a stroke later in life
the mass media regularly feature stories encouraging people to maintain diets that are low in cholesterol
RenCo has significantly more employees than Garnet has
RenCo's employees are unlikely to have higher cholesterol levels than Garnet's employees
the average length of time an employee stays with RenCo is less than it is with Garnet
类比
G和R都为员工提供health care(HC)
∵胆固醇水平高了但置之不理,会导致疾病变严重了很费钱
∴G:对员工的胆固醇水平测量、并给予治疗→R能省钱
但是R没有采用这个策略
果因,寻找策略不合理之处,或者G和R的不同之处
A、早期治疗并不能完全削减后来爆发的可能性(但拖着不治疗不是更不好吗?而且,用了not entirely,说明G策略还是有用的),有些反原文
B、大众传媒呼吁民众保持低胆固醇饮食,无关
C、R比G的雇员多,无关,一定程度上加强
D、R的员工不可能比G胆固醇水平高(打开脑洞:如果G\R两家的胆固醇水平都达到爆发严重疾病的水准,那就是小巫见大巫,也不用比了),无关
E、R的员工比G待的时间短(也就是说还没等病情爆发R员工就离职了,哼哼,资本家),CORRECT
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论