Which of the following most logically completes the argument?
Utrania was formerly a major petroleum exporter, but in recent decades economic stagnation and restrictive regulations inhibited investment in new oil fields. In consequence, Utranian oil exports dropped steadily as old fields became depleted. Utrania's currently improving economic situation, together with less-restrictive regulations, will undoubtedly result in the rapid development of new fields. However, it would be premature to conclude that the rapid development of new fields will result in higher oil exports, because __________.
the price of oil is expected to remain relatively stable over the next several years
the improvement in the economic situation in Utrania is expected to result in a dramatic increase in the proportion of Utranians who own automobiles
most of the investment in new oil fields in Utrania is expected to come from foreign sources
new technology is available to recover oil from old oil fields formerly regarded as depleted
many of the new oil fields in Utrania are likely to be as productive as those that were developed during the period when Utrania was a major oil exporter
理解错了。。。居然把C里面的外来投资想成了投资国外的油田(然后出口给别的国家)。。。做题的时候在想啥呢=,=
石油出口大国Utrania的石油开采被政府限制,其最近的经济发展源于政府对新产业的政策宽松,且文中问Utrania的经济繁荣不会导致石油出口上升的理由。新油田开发受限,产量无法上升,不会导致出口上升,但要解释Utrania的经济繁荣从石油出口转到什么方向,B从石油需求由出口转为内需解释了这个问题。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论