The view has prevailed for the better part of the twentieth century that small firms do not perform an important role in Western economies. Official policies in many countries have favored large units of production because there were strong reasons to believe that large firms were superior to small firms in virtually every aspect of economic performance--productivity, technological progress, and job security and compensation. However, in the 1970s, evidence began to suggest that small firms in some countries were outperforming their larger counterparts. Perhaps the best example of this trend was in the steel industry, where new firms entered the market in the form of "mini-mills," and small-firm employment expanded, while many large companies shut down plants and reduced employment. Although no systematic evidence exists to determine unequivocally whether smaller units of production are as efficient as large firms or are, in fact, more efficient, some researchers have concluded that the accumulated evidence to date indicates that small firms are at least not burdened with an inherent size disadvantage.
Thus, an alternative view has emerged in the economics literature, arguing that small firms make several important contributions to industrial markets. First, small firms are often the source of the kind of innovative activity that leads to technological change. Small firms generate market turbulence that creates additional dimensions of competition, and they also promote international competition through newly created niches. Finally, small firms in recent years have generated the preponderant share of new jobs.
However, empirical knowledge about the relative roles of large and small firms is generally based upon anecdotal evidence and case studies, and such evidence has proved inadequate to answer major questions concerning the role of small firms across various industries and nations. An additional difficulty is that it is not obvious what criteria one should use to distinguish small firms from large ones. While a "small firm" is often defined as an enterprise with fewer than 500 employees, research studies of small firms use a wide variety of definitions.
The passage is primarily concerned with
dismissing a challenge to a traditional viewpoint
suggesting a new solution to a long-standing problem
resolving a conflict between two competing viewpoints
discussing the emergence of an alternative viewpoint
defending an alternative viewpoint against possible counterevidence
题目分析:
题目释义:
主旨题目
考点:
主旨(Main idea)
旨在考察我们对文章整体的把握程度,对文章的结构的分析能力和把控能力,以及对作者逻辑的判断。
作者开篇提出了一个大公司胜过小公司的观点,然后反驳并举一些小公司胜过大公司的证据,然后顺理成章的提出另一个观点,最后一段说出了这个观点的潜在问题(让步)。
选项分析:
A选项:驳回一个攻击传统观点 的观点。作者其实通篇认为传统观点是有问题的,所以提出一个新的观点,最后一段只是指出这个新的观点还有待完善证明之处,并不是要驳回它。
B选项:提出对一个一直存在的问题的新的解释。文中没有提到一个一直存在的问题,更不用说作者提出解释了。
C选项:解决两个观点的争端。作者倾向于对第二个观点做论证,第一个观点只是对第二个观点的一个对比引出,并不注重这两个观点的争端。
D选项:Correct. 讨论另一个观点的出现。同“考点”,文章都在围绕着这个“另一个观点”转。作者的目的是讨论这个观点。
E选项:为第二个观点与可能存在的“反对证据”做辩护。文中的第三段也只是提出第二个观点存在的不足(反对证据),并没有为了其做辩护的意思。
看叙述篇幅,第一段后、第二段均是,第三段也指出了这个opinion所在的不足
很完整的emergence
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论