The view has prevailed for the better part of the twentieth century that small firms do not perform an important role in Western economies. Official policies in many countries have favored large units of production because there were strong reasons to believe that large firms were superior to small firms in virtually every aspect of economic performance--productivity, technological progress, and job security and compensation. However, in the 1970s, evidence began to suggest that small firms in some countries were outperforming their larger counterparts. Perhaps the best example of this trend was in the steel industry, where new firms entered the market in the form of "mini-mills," and small-firm employment expanded, while many large companies shut down plants and reduced employment. Although no systematic evidence exists to determine unequivocally whether smaller units of production are as efficient as large firms or are, in fact, more efficient, some researchers have concluded that the accumulated evidence to date indicates that small firms are at least not burdened with an inherent size disadvantage.
Thus, an alternative view has emerged in the economics literature, arguing that small firms make several important contributions to industrial markets. First, small firms are often the source of the kind of innovative activity that leads to technological change. Small firms generate market turbulence that creates additional dimensions of competition, and they also promote international competition through newly created niches. Finally, small firms in recent years have generated the preponderant share of new jobs.
However, empirical knowledge about the relative roles of large and small firms is generally based upon anecdotal evidence and case studies, and such evidence has proved inadequate to answer major questions concerning the role of small firms across various industries and nations. An additional difficulty is that it is not obvious what criteria one should use to distinguish small firms from large ones. While a "small firm" is often defined as an enterprise with fewer than 500 employees, research studies of small firms use a wide variety of definitions.
According to the passage, an important contribution of small firms to industrial markets is that small firms
operate more efficiently than large firms
offer high job security and compensation
cause international competition to decrease
help prevent market turbulence from affecting competition
frequently undertake activities that result in technological change
题目分析:
题目释义:
细节题目
考点:
支持主题(Supporting ideas)
旨在考察我们对文章细节的认知
题目中问小公司的贡献,定位在第二段“arguing that small firms make several important contributions to industrial markets.”以后的句子。
选项分析:
A选项:比大公司操作更加高效。这个选项的关键词定位在第一段“Although no systematic evidence exists to determine unequivocally whether smaller units of production are as efficient as large firms or are, in fact, more efficient,”。所以效率高是没有被证明的。
B选项:提供高的工作安全和补偿。文中没有提到工作安全和补偿问题。(貌似常识上大公司工作更保障些吧。。。。不能根据常识判断。。。)
C选项:让国际竞争下降。这个选项说反了,定位在“and they also promote international competition through newly created niches”。
D选项:帮助防止市场变动影响竞争。这个选项也基本说反了,定位在“Small firms generate market turbulence that creates additional dimensions of competition”。
E选项:Correct. 经常承担活动导致技术的改变。定位在“First, small firms are often the source of the kind of innovative activity that leads to technological change.”。几乎是原句的直接出现。
笔记:
unequivocally
毫不含糊地
找到第一段去了:这里是说起码不拖后腿
Although no systematic evidence exists to determine unequivocally whether smaller units of production are as efficient as large firms or are, in fact, more efficient, some researchers have concluded that the accumulated evidence to date indicates that small firms are at least not burdened with an inherent size disadvantage.
第二段的内容就有小公司引领创新了
这个读到了,第一印象也是想选E,自己找到第一段去改错了
E选项:Correct. 经常承担活动导致技术的改变。定位在“First, small firms are often the source of the kind of innovative activity that leads to technological change.”。几乎是原句的直接出现。题目看仔细,不是except!
阅读没有记住细节
直接细节题:First, small firms are often the source of the kind of innovative activity that leads to technological change. Small firms generate market turbulence that creates additional dimensions of competition, and they also promote international competition through newly created niches. Finally, small firms in recent years have generated the preponderant share of new jobs.
Although no systematic evidence exists to determine unequivocally whether smaller units of production are as efficient as large firms or are, 后面半句in fact, more efficient, some researchers have concluded that the accumulated evidence to date indicates that small firms are at least not burdened with an inherent size disadvantage 说了More efficient,为什么不对呢?