Unlike many United States cities, where a river is no longer the focal point of urban life, the river in San Antonio winds through the middle of the business district, and the River Walk, or Paseo del Rio, is the city's most popular attraction.
Unlike many United States cities, where a river is no longer the focal point of urban life, the river in San Antonio
Unlike the river in many cities in the United States, which is no longer the focal point of urban life, in San Antonio the river
Today the river in many cities in the United States is no longer the focal point of urban life, unlike San Antonio, where it
In few United States cities today, a river is the focal point of urban life, but the river in San Antonio
No longer do many cities in the United States have a river as the focal point of urban life, but in San Antonio the river
E,倒装
No longer do many cities in the United States have a river as the focal point of urban life,
=Many cities in the United States no longer have a river as the focal point of urban life,
(存疑))B:unlike对比,与 the river in many cities in the United States相对应,the river in San Antonio 更好。which错误修饰the United States。
C:unlike的对比错误
D;不存在对比
E:很多城市不再把河流当做重点,但是SA的河流仍然是生活重点。 强调 这个 “no longer”,不再是……仍然是……
like比较,主句要立马给出比较对象;
A many United States cities和the river不可比
B 主句没有立马给出比较对象
C the river和 San Antonio不可比
D in San Antonio放在the river后面,意思是Antinio的河,和the River Walk是两条河,语义不合理
E 正确
这几个叹号直接打醒我了,就是说d的表达在文法上没错,但是和原句表达的侧重点上不一样。登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
drastic change in meaning
this sentence has completely gotten rid of any reference to the concept of 'no longer'. while all the other sentences say that things have changed, this sentence presents the situation as if it's always been that way.
所以其实语法没有错误,是逻辑错误喽。
更正,所以D项其实语法没有错误,是逻辑错误喽。登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论