The United States government has a long-standing policy of using federal funds to keep small business viable. The Small Business Act of 1953 authorized the Small Business Administration (SBA) to enter into contracts with government agencies having procurement powers and to arrange for fulfillment of these contracts by awarding subcontracts to small businesses. In the mid-1960's, during the war on poverty years, Congress hoped to encourage minority entrepreneurs by directing such funding to minority businesses. At first this funding was directed toward minority entrepreneurs with very low incomes. A 1967 amendment to the Economic Opportunity Act directed the SBA to pay special attention to minority-owned businesses located in urban or rural areas characterized by high proportions of unemployed or low-income individuals. Since then, the answer given to the fundamental question of who the recipients should be—the most economically disadvantaged or those with the best prospects for business success—has changed, and the social goals of the programs have shifted, resulting in policy changes.

The first shift occurred during the early 1970's. While the goal of assisting the economically disadvantaged entrepreneur remained, a new goal emerged: to remedy the effects of past discrimination. In fact, in 1970 the SBA explicitly stated that their main goal was to increase the number of minority-owned businesses. At the time, minorities constituted seventeen percent of the nation's population, but only four percent of the nation's self-employed. This ownership gap was held to be the result of past discrimination. Increasing the number of minority-owned firms was seen as a way to remedy this problem. In that context, providing funding to minority entrepreneurs in middle- and high-income brackets seemed justified.

In the late 1970's, the goals of minority-business funding programs shifted again. At the Minority Business Development Agency, for example, the goal of increasing numbers of minority-owned firms was supplanted by the goal of creating and assisting more minority-owned substantive firms with future growth potential. Assisting manufacturers or wholesalers became far more important than assisting small service businesses. Minority-business funding programs were now justified as instruments for economic development, particularly for creating jobs in minority communities of high unemployment.


The passage mentions which of the following as a basic consideration in administering minority-business funding programs?


Coming up with funding for the programs

Encouraging government agencies to assist middle- and high-income minority entrepreneurs

Recognizing the profit potential of small service businesses in urban communities

Determining who should be the recipients of the funding

Determining which entrepreneurs are likely to succeed

考题讲解

此讲解的内容由AI生成,还未经人工审阅,仅供参考。


D. Determining who should be the recipients of the funding

正确答案是 D。文章指出,联邦政府一直有政策,用联邦资金来保持小型企业的可持续性。1953年的《小企业法》授权小企业行政署与政府有采购权的机构签订合同,并安排其他小企业承担分包行动。 在1960年代中期,在反贫困战争期间,国会希望通过把这笔资金指向少数民族企业来鼓励少数民族创业者。 1967年修订的《经济机会法》要求小企业行政署特别关注位于“失业或低收入人口比例高的城市或乡村地区"的少数民族拥有的企业。 因此,问题“谁应该成为资助对象--经济最困难的人呢,还是那些有最好商业成功前景的人?”已经被回答,并且社会目标也发生了变化,从而导致政策的变化。因此,正确答案是选项D:确定谁应该成为资助对象。

展开显示

登录注册 后可以参加讨论

Prep2008E1-RC